Wan 2.6 — アリババのオープンソースAI動画生成ツール

アリババのWan 2.6はスピードとオープンソース品質を両立。20〜40秒で生成、スタイル一貫性、ネイティブオーディオ付き。今すぐ無料でお試しください。

Fast generation — lifestyle content in seconds

Rapid iteration — test multiple prompt ideas quickly

Wan 2.6とは何ですか?

Wan 2.6はアリババのDAMO Academyが開発し、Apache 2.0ライセンスのもとでオープンソース公開されています。当プラットフォームで最速のAI動画モデルで、クリップあたり20〜40秒で生成します。Ref2V機能は参照画像のビジュアルスタイルをロックし、生成間の一貫性を確保します。Eコマースコンテンツ、高速反復、シリーズブランド動画に最適です。

Wan 2.6の中身 — スピード、Ref2V、オープンソース

最大時間
5秒
解像度
720p〜1080p
生成速度
約20〜40秒
アスペクト比
16:9、9:16、1:1
入力タイプ
テキスト、画像、参照画像(Ref2V)
オープンソース
あり(Apache 2.0)

最速の動画モデル — そのコストは?

50 credits for a 5-second video

At 10 credits/second, Wan costs the same per-second as Kling. A 5-second video costs ~$0.50. The real value proposition is speed — at 20–40 seconds per generation, you can iterate faster than any other model, making your credits more productive even at the same per-video price.

仕上がりより純粋なスピードが重要な場面

When it shines

Wan 2.6 is the best choice for rapid iteration workflows and reference-based content creation. It's the fastest video model (20–40 seconds), making it ideal for testing dozens of prompt variations quickly. The Ref2V feature is unique — upload a reference image and Wan maintains visual consistency across generations, perfect for product video series and brand content. As an open-source model, it also appeals to developers and teams who value transparency.

When to pick a different model

If you need guaranteed 1080p output, Wan's variable resolution (720p–1080p) is a risk — use Veo, Sora, or Kling for consistent HD. If cinematic visual quality is your priority, Veo 3.1 or Sora will look better. For the cheapest per-video cost, Runway Gen-4 at 10 credits beats Wan's 50 credits. And for human motion content (dance, sports, action), Seedance is specifically optimized for body movement fidelity.

Limitations worth knowing

  • 5-second maximum duration. Wan only generates 5-second clips. For content that needs more time to develop — storytelling, product reveals, dramatic sequences — consider Sora (up to 20s) or Kling (up to 10s).
  • Variable quality (720p–1080p). Wan's output resolution varies between 720p and 1080p depending on the content. For guaranteed 1080p, use Veo, Sora, or Kling. If consistent resolution matters for your project, Wan may surprise you with occasional 720p output.
  • Less cinematic polish. Wan prioritizes speed and versatility over visual perfection. The output looks good but not film-grade. For premium visual quality, Veo 3.1 is in a different league.

Wan vs Sora vs Kling vs Runway — スピード重視比較

指標wansoraklingrunway
Speed20-40s2-5 min30s30-60s
Cost (5s clip)50 credits30 credits10 credits10 credits
Reference InputRef2V (style lock)NoNoImage-to-video
Max Duration5s20s10s10s
Open SourceYesNoNoNo
Resolution720p-1080p1080p1080p720p
Audio OutputYes (lip-sync)NoNoNo

Ready to try Wan 2.6?

Free credits, no credit card, results in 60 seconds

Try Wan 2.6 Free

WanのRef2Vをブランド一貫性に活用する

1

Keep Prompts Direct — Wan Prefers Brevity

Wan generates in 20-40 seconds because it processes prompts efficiently. Long, elaborate descriptions don't improve results. Focus on the key elements: subject, action, and one style keyword.

A golden retriever catching a frisbee on a sunny beach, slow motion, warm tones
2

Use Ref2V for Brand Consistency

Upload a reference image that defines your visual style — color palette, lighting mood, composition approach. Wan will generate new content that matches that visual DNA, even with completely different subjects.

3

Iterate Fast — 10 Prompts in 5 Minutes

Wan's speed advantage is best used for rapid exploration. Don't perfect your first prompt — generate 5-10 variations quickly, identify what works, then refine the winning direction.

よくある質問